Migration Policy and Welfare Chauvinism in the United Kingdom: European Divergence or Trend-Setting?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Growing hostility towards large-scale immigration following the EU enlargement (2004) and, later, increase in South-North flows due to global financial crisis (2008), played a major role Brexit referendum of 2016. This marked departure United Kingdom from European Union and its mechanisms “free movement”. Such was not framed simply terms xenophobia but, rather, as “welfare chauvinism”. chapter critically examines last few decades policy political debates around intra-European migration Kingdom, key trends that have led (not so) unpredictable referendum, scenarios which been set motion with UK-EU Agreement 2020. In spite strong sense British exceptionalism has informed UK discussions, some fundamentals underpinning this process much common what we are witnessing elsewhere Europe, stratification (welfare) rights for different categories migrants being used pragmatic – if cynical mechanism regulate entry settlement. fact, at institutional level appears yet rapture within framework, may end up revealing itself part wider trend among both Northern Southern regimes: restrictionist reconfiguration welfare-migration nexus. race welfare bottom is only affecting newly arrived migrants, but eroding population.
منابع مشابه
Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal
Health services and policy research (HSPR) represent a multidisciplinary field which integrates knowledge from health economics, health policy, health technology assessment, epidemiology, political science among other fields, to evaluate decisions in health service delivery. Health service decisions are informed by evidence at the clinical, organizational, and policy level, levels with distinct...
متن کاملMaking Research Matter; Comment on “Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal”
We offer a UK-based commentary on the recent “Perspective” published in IJHPM by Thakkar and Sullivan. We are sympathetic to the authors’ call for increased funding for health service and policy research (HSPR). However, we point out that increasing that investment – in any of the three countries they compare: Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom– will ipso facto not necessarily lea...
متن کاملthe investigation of research articles in applied linguistics: convergence and divergence in iranian elt context
چکیده ندارد.
Public Spending on Health Services and Policy Research in Canada: A Reflection on Thakkar and Sullivan; Comment on “Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal”
Vidhi Thakkar and Terrence Sullivan have done a careful and thought-provoking job in trying to establish comparable estimates of public spending on health services and policy research (HSPR) in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. Their main recommendation is a call for an international collaboration to develop common terms and categories of HSPR. This paper raises two additional q...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: IMISCOE research series
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2364-4087', '2364-4095']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26002-5_12